Also, in Win2K3, Everyone does not even include the Anonymous Logon account, which would make it irrelevant whether or not anonymous access was allowed to the shares.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Ganger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 6:31 PM > To: Murad Talukdar; [email protected] > Subject: RE: DACLS for software distribution points... > > At Wednesday, July 05, 2006 6:02 PM:, Murad Talukdar wrote: > > > Hi all, > > MS says in this article that the DACLS for software distribution > > points should be EVERYONE: READ and Administrator: Full Control, > > Change, Read. > > > > > http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/45a873d > d-660d-4de > 6-aa > > c4-8a03974796121033.mspx?mfr=true > > > > Why shouldn't the EVERYONE be removed and replaced with > Authenticated > > Users? > > I was thinking of doing this and can't really see any > adverse impact. > > It probably won't have any adverse impact, but do remember > that in XP and 2003 Everyone no longer allows anonymous > access unless explicitly permitted by Group Policy, so there > is no effective difference. > > -- > Devin L. Ganger Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 3Sharp LLC Phone: 425.882.1032 x 109 > 15311 NE 90th Street Cell: 425.239.2575 > Redmond, WA 98052 Fax: 425.702.8455 > (e)Mail Insecurity: http://blogs.3sharp.com/blog/deving/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
