I may have missed some contributions to this thread that aren't reflected
here, but why would you think that Chris' query implies that he is doing any
of what you suggest below? 

Laura 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Co-Hosting SQL with IIS FTP service
> 
> Chris
> 
> Possibly not the best email to send from your employers email server.
> It suggests you are using MS servers with IIS and FTP enabled 
> backending, I would guess "on the same box" to MS SQL.
> 
> While you will get some information about the 
> vulnerabilities, most here would expect you to keep your 
> banks systems patched.  What you will get from this kind of 
> forum is advise on patches to vulnerabilities that have been 
> disclosed;  However, you will not get info on new exploits 
> (the zero-day type hackers use against the likes of banks) on 
> non-publicly disclosed vulnerabilities.  
> 
> Therefore, you will not be able to prevent exploits that MS 
> is still working to patch.  With a disclosure regarding your 
> infrastructure on such a public forum, you should watch your 
> front facing Sy barriers for increased attacks aimed 
> specifically at MS architecture.  Best give the IDS/IPS and 
> incident staff a nod too.  I recognise you may be double 
> bluffing, but I will bet you will still get a 100% increase 
> in the MS exploits thrown at your FW and internet gateways.
> 
> As to your question, try secunia.com, www.osvdb.org and good 
> old www.packetstormsecurity.nl
> 
> Steve A
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2006 15:42
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Co-Hosting SQL with IIS FTP service
> 
> Can anyone guide me as to what type of issues with 
> inter-system dependencies might arise by co hosting IIS FTP 
> service with SQL?
> 
> 
> Anyone know of any articles on the exploits?
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ---
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ---
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to