Alberto,

Terminal services shouldn't be run on a DC, but DHCP is fine (it's supported by 
MS)

Read
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816592 if your going to be allowing dynamic 
updates.

HTH,

Mark

On 1 Mar 2011, at 05:20, "wt521125" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all and thanks for your replys.
> Mr. Koch, we'll use Windows server 2003 for new VM's.
> We are planning to replace the W2K Domain Controller and convert the Windows
> 2003 to primary domain controller and virtualize a second domain controller
> using Windows 2003 too and raise the domain functional level to 2003. 
> 
> Regards,
> Alberto Medina
> 
> From: Steven J. Koch [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: Alberto Medina
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Windows Server Roles
> 
> Alberto,
> 
> What version of Windows will you be using for the new virtual servers?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> 
> Steven J. Koch
> Systems Development Engineer
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Alberto Medina <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm planning in migrating some servers to VM's for separate some roles and
> for and replace some old servers. Currently we have 2 domain controllers,
> one on Windows 2000 and other in Windows 2003. Windows 2000 is the primary
> domain controller and W2K3 is Domain Controller, Terminal Services, and DHCP
> (and of course DNS for AD), and I want add VPN server for remote access. I
> have found that is not recommended to run DHCP or Terminal services in a
> Domain controller,  so  I want separate those roles to VM's but I want to
> know which of this roles can I run together in a VM without affecting
> security.
> 
> Please let me know your opinions about this.
> 
> Thank you and Best Regards,
> Alberto Medina
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> ¸Ï¿ì×¢²áÑÅ»¢³¬´óÈÝÁ¿Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏä?
> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to