----- Forwarded message from jeremy hunsinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: jeremy hunsinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Warchalking does not exist: a wager. To: cypherpunks Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:01:50 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
Forwarded for a colleague:
For background, Warchalking is the use of symbols (marked with chalk) to
indicate the presence of a Wi-Fi hotspot. In pure form, the story of
warchalking is that there is a subculture of Wi-Fi users that use chalk
to
communicate with each other about Wi-Fi locations. Hip/cool businesses
then
co-opted the subcultural warchalking to advertise their own hotspots.
More
at: http://www.warchalking.org/
My contention is that the first (subcultural) story about warchalking
above
is entirely a media phenomenon -- it is a beautiful idea, but it doesn't
make any sense as a directory service to find Wi-Fi. It is too easy to
miss
a warchalk mark, and the chalk wears away (or washes away in the rain)
too
quickly. Warchalking symbols were heavily promoted in the New York
Times
just *48 hours* after they were first made public on the Web. There
was a
subsequent wave of media stories about warchalking, giving everyone
ideas.
Every single occurrence of chalk I've found can be attributed to
chalkers
who want to self-promote their own mark. So I believe that people *do*
rarely make warchalking marks for various reasons (to be cool, to
advertise
for their own network) but I *don't* believe that people use warchalking
marks in a meaningful way to find Wi-Fi.
After the conversation with Steve, on December 18th I posted an call to many colleagues around the world asking for verifiable instances of warchalking that work the way that warchalking describes itself. Reports to date: zero. If warchalking worked as a directory location service, shouldn't I be able to find it?
I just had a close call -- a friend told me that my office at Oxford had
been warchalked. Since it is a WEP (non-open) node and I didn't do it,
this
could be half of a "true" instance of warchalking! I ran out as soon
as I
heard but couldn't find the mark. It must have washed away? (Here in
England, it is raining.)
So I am willing to propose a wager, or a bounty. I'll bet one dollar
that
warchalking is not a meaningful way of locating Wi-Fi hotspots. To win
the
bounty, can anyone deliver someone that uses warchalking to locate Wi-Fi
hotspots?
Caveats: (1) Warchalking done by the provider of the hotspot does not count -- it is supposedly a co-option of the "pure" subculture. I dispute the subculture, not the self-promotion. (2) I am not disputing that wardriving, warwalking, and online hotspot mapping (warchalking with bits in GIS databases, not with chalk) exist as advertised. (Though others have.) My beef here is only about the chalk part.
I've made a web page for this bet that has the relevant emails I've sent and some links: http://www.niftyc.org/bet/
As you may have guessed I'm writing a paper about this. Email me if you
want a copy when I finish. Thank you for any help!
Christian
-- http://www.niftyc.org/
----- End forwarded message -----
----------------------------------------------------------------------- --
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- --
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------------------- --
___________________________________________________________ FoIB Mailing List - Bits, Analysis, Digital Group Therapy http://www.ianbell.com
