Hi, Goran... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ok, please don't fork already. :) And note that this "please" goes to > BOTH of you. It means that I would want you guys to *co*-operate not > operate in isolation. Don't worry about this too much! I'm definitely going to keep working on getting patches into the mainline, it's just that I need a separate branch to satisfy the needs of my other projects while patches are still being talked about and reworked for inclusion in the mainline. I'm using Mercurial Queues, which helps ensure that my patches are *not* a fork, but rather a layering on of other features that can be easily submitted or changed. > Now, if Fonc is going to be run as a "closed shop project" - which I > really, really hope not - but which I also fear - then, well, then I > will reconsider and perhaps instead look at Michael to give me the > satisfaction of a living open source project. And then we can turn it > all around - we pull nice stuff from Ian instead of the other way > around. Urgh. I don't want this to happen... the only direct users of my branch should be the people who need the patches it contains to be able to use my other software (Figure, Pledge (an accounting package whose web page is still to come)). So, once I announce Pledge, I think you'll see the point of my "branch". Thanks for the comments, -- Michael FIG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ http://michael.fig.org/ \// _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
