Hi, "Krzysztof Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't you have this problem in both cases? If the changes are > independent, it shouldn't matter whether they are in the form of a > patch file or in git (in which case they can be extracted as > patches). The problem that I have is of interleaved changes. I work for a little on patch A, then patch B, then patch A again, but A and B should be kept separate so that they can be easily reviewed. A and B may or may have dependencies on one another. > Of course it all depends on what form Ian would find convenient - Yes, that's ultimately the deciding factor. I think it's up to me or somebody else to find out what that workflow really is/should be. -- Michael FIG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ http://michael.fig.org/ \// _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
