ROFL! Most of the time, for most people, organizations, and businesses, roll-your-own crypto is totally stupid! But a language for metadescription of cryptographic algorithms totally makes sense, both as a way of generating standards compliant implementations, and to address the problem of "my platform doesn't speak C and I need a secure/reliable crypto implementation."
Cool! Now if we only had the metadescriptions:) On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Monty Zukowski <mo...@codetransform.com>wrote: > I wanted to bring to your attention Ben Laurie's "Stupid: A > Metalanguage For Cryptography". Despite the name it actually is > helpful for abstracting the design of cryptographic algorithms. > > http://www.links.org/?p=864 > > Monty > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > -- Casey Ransberger
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
