On 8/23/2011 9:54 PM, Julian Leviston wrote:
I usually just leave off commenting, but I personally don't think this is
appropriate for this list.
fair enough, mostly just trying to find where the lines of
appropriateness are...
sorry for any inconvenience.
so, I guess what I have determined so far:
programming languages are ok;
hardware is sometimes ok (provided it does not run x86 or ARM, like
alternative HW only);
physics and biology are ok;
FOSS game engines are not ok (unless the topic is voxels or metaverse or
similar? like a few weeks ago);
internet is maybe ok (browsers/... seem ok);
...
hmm...
well, maybe the pattern will be understood eventually?...
maybe some sort of description of what is and is not ok would make
sense, like a description of the bounds of appropriateness or what
constitutes a valid topic or similar?...
Blog: http://random8.zenunit.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/random8r
Learn: http://sensei.zenunit.com/
New video up now at http://sensei.zenunit.com/
real fastcgi rails deploy process! Check it out now!
links: errm... these don't make sense, I am not sure I get the intention
here.
the first 2 links seem to just contain assorted comments with little
apparent relation between them.
On 24/08/2011, at 2:38 PM, BGB<cr88...@gmail.com> wrote:
sorry, I don't know if anyone here will find any of this interesting.
removed, as apparently it was not interesting.
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
