Michael FIG wrote:
Loup Vaillant<l...@loup-vaillant.fr> writes:
You could also play the human compiler: use the better syntax in the
comments, and implement a translation of it in code just below. But
then you have to manually make sure they are synchronized. Comments
are good. Needing them is bad.
Or use a preprocessor that substitutes the translation inline
automatically.
Which is a way of implementing the syntax… How is this different than
my "Then you write the parser"? Sure you can use a preprocessor, but
you still have to write the macros for your new syntax.
Loup.
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
