Croquet does replicated distributed computing. LOCUS did "freely migrating
system nodes".
One actually needs both (though a lot can be done with today's capacities just
using the Croquet techniques).
Cheers,
Alan
>________________________________
> From: Shawn Morel <shawnmo...@me.com>
>To: Alan Kay <alan.n...@yahoo.com>; Fundamentals of New Computing
><fonc@vpri.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:14 PM
>Subject: Migrating / syncing computation "live-documents"
>
>
>
>
>Taken from the massive multi-thread "Error trying to compile COLA"
>
>And I've also mentioned Popek's LOCUS system as a nice model for migrating
>processes over a network. It was Unix only, but there was nothing about his
>design that required this.
>
>
>When thinking about storing and accessing documents, it's fairly
>straightforward to think of some sort of migration / synchronization scheme.
>
>In thinking of objects more on par with VMs / computers / services, has there
>been any work on process migration that's of any importance since LOCUS? Did
>Croquet push the boundaries of distributing computations?
>
>
>shawn
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
