I guess you have to define the behavior and what purpose it should have before one can say it makes sense to apply it in an other context.
Karl On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:10 PM, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm thinking more about copying behavior between different address > spaces. > > Hehe, I thought so, too. Scratch 2.0 has the "Backback" so you can > (sort of) do it remotely. > > The question is, when you want to copy and paste things from a > different language, what the fundamental execution model is. You'd > bring the interpreter and/or the parser of the language with copied > "code". I heard that the CompiledMethod object in an earlier Smalltalk > implementation had "interpreter" field, or at least they talked about > it. > > As long as the receiving side recognizes it in some way, it would be > something conceivable... > -- > -- Yoshiki > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
