"Not to say English best but it is what most people know and using it in programs would make them readable by more people until people adopt a purer language like Hebrew."
I'm not sure if you're joking or trolling, but Hebrew is hardly a "purer language" by any definition, as there is no such thing. This 19th century mindset died out a long time ago, along with the pretensions of contemporary "linguists" at demonstrating the purported "language decay". We've come along way since then in our understanding of how languages evolve. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Kirk Fraser <overcomer....@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Tristan Slominski < > tristan.slomin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "Thus a major improvement for world computing would be careful adherence >> to a world wide natural language" >> >> That seems to be contrary to how the world works. We can't even agree >> whether to read bytes from right to left or left to right ( >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endianness). >> >> http://xkcd.com/927/ >> >> > It appears you are successfully working with English as do most people who > communicate internationally. Not to say English best but it is what most > people know and using it in programs would make them readable by more > people until people adopt a purer language like Hebrew. > > -- > Kirk W. Fraser > http://freetom.info/TrueChurch - Replace the fraud churches with the true > church. > http://congressionalbiblestudy.org - Fix America by first fixing its > Christian foundation. > http://freetom.info - Example of False Justice common in America > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
