Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615849 Paul Flo Williams <p...@frixxon.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |p...@frixxon.co.uk --- Comment #4 from Paul Flo Williams <p...@frixxon.co.uk> 2010-07-21 08:09:45 EDT --- This review was done so quickly that I didn't have the chance to say this before. The spec has these two lines: #license text extracted from font file Source3: License.txt The Licensing Guidelines say: "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. If the source package does not include the text of the license(s), the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines I take this to mean that we can't extract the license from font metadata and package that as a separate file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
