Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748522 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2011-11-17 05:37:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Because I don't relish the > > thought of packaging it separately (I know where the unicode consortium > > publishes it, but the legal aspects are unpleasant) > > I've just taken a look at the Unicode terms of use: > > http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html > > and the license (Exhibit 1 on that page), which according to this message: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2009-February/000540.html > > is MIT. That's a nice change. IIRC it was not always so (that's why I piggybacked on perl originally) > So, packaging the data could be useful to us? Yes. That would help dejavu, but also all the packages that ship unicode definitions, and could be cleaned up to use a central package (that could be synced with unicode releases instead of each package shipping obsolete definitions) If you feel like doing some resource packaging http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources is also duplicated everywhere Otherwise I'll just package unicode data next time dejavu does a release and I need to rebuild the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
