https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854348
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> --- Right. Apparently upstream has made changes a lot between 4 and 5. https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-desktop/setup/upgrading-from-version-4 (In reply to Fabio Alessandro Locati from comment #2) > 1. create a link from /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome/Font Awesome 5 > Free-Regular-400.otf to /usr/share/fonts/fontawesome/FontAwesome.otf so that > the new package provides the expected font. Being a major release, some > glyphs have been dropped/renamed, but the majority should still work If they are exactly same, that should works. but is it really same? > 2. epoch the package, move it back to 4 and create fontawesome5-fonts for FA5 As it is stated at https://github.com/FortAwesome/Font-Awesome/tree/4f4cb7c2f55d14d24f10390ebfeab0d25af612f3, 4 is EOL'd. the main package name should be provided for 5 or later. > 3. leave the package as is and create fontawesome4-fonts for FA4 So this way looks good to me and better correcting something in the dependant packages for 5 in the future. > > What would be the best approach to this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
