https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <ta...@redhat.com> --- For a workaround, we could drop Conflict lines in both google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts and google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts and install google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts. Fortunately this still works as a workaround for some reasons. fontconfig estimate a score to determine the best font and give same scores to both static and vf fonts. In this case, first entry will be picked up though, when creating a cache, fontconfig sorts sub-directory entries in a cache alphabetically. thus, static fonts where puts into /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts will appears earlier than vf fonts where puts into /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240646 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240646%23c2 _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
