https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230471
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #5) > I think the google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts-2.004 already in F38 should *cover* > GB18030-2022 Level 2 according to the issue you list. (Fixed typo: over -> cover) Also from my basic check the coverage of Noto Sans 2.004 and Noto Serif 2.001 looks similar for basic GB18030-2022 (without addendum 1 - also not ratified yet from my understanding) - though I haven't compared them glyph for glyph. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230471 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202230471%23c7 _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
