Around 20 o'clock on Jul 12, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Where the Macintosh/Roman/English entry was not English; I don't > know if that was the reason for the current code or whether its > unintentional. The reason may well be that all of the Microsoft names are in Unicode while the Macintosh names are in Apple Roman. It's a lot easier to translate UTF-16 into Latin-1 than Apple Roman... > Still, it seems to me that if we don't have a Microsoft/English > entry, we might as well take the Macintosh/Roman/English entry - > it doesn't seem likely to be *worse* than using a known non-English > Microsoft/Unicode entry. I've started putting code together that ignores the FreeType family/style values and walks the name table if available. I have an apple roman transcoding table available and I'm not afraid to use it. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team HP Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
