+1 it would make JFOR and FOP "richer"
"John Kattestaart (Freeler)" wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2001 21:06 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [vote] Merging JFor with FOP > > > > > > I don't officially count as these things go, but merging jfor and > > fop would > > solve several issues I currently have. > > > > Yes combinune fop and jfor would make life easier. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
