To paraphrase Columbo, "Just one more thing...." In [WARN]: Sum of fixed column widths 507400 greater than maximum specified IPD 487 559 what does IPD refer to? Although, I'm now no longer getting the table-layout warning, I'm still getting this one. thanks, matthew a
> -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew L. Avizinis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 0.20.3rc bug > > > excellent. > thank you > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:11 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 0.20.3rc bug > > > > > > Place the attribute 'table-layout="fixed"' on all your <fo:table> > > elements. > > > > The default without the attribute is "auto", which is not > supported in FOP > > yet. Just another change in the latest release. > > > > Scott > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Matthew L. Avizinis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:49 PM > > Subject: RE: 0.20.3rc bug > > > > > > > OK. I've read the CHANGES file and I see the error of my ways. > > > but now what's this? I don't see anything about it and > didn't get this > > > before either. My fo file doesn't have this any in it at all, > > so why the > > > warning now? All the table column widths are measured in mm, btw. > > > [WARN]: table-layout=auto is not supported, using fixed! > > > [WARN]: Sum of fixed column widths 507400 greater than > maximum specified > > IPD > > > 487 > > > thanks, > > > Matthew L. Avizinis <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Gleim Publications, Inc. > > > 4201 NW 95th Blvd. > > > Gainesville, FL 32606 > > > (352)-375-0772 ext. 101 > > > www.gleim.com <http://www.gleim.com> > > > > > > > ======================================================================= > > > com·put·ing (kum' pyoot ing) > > > 1. n the art of calculating how much time you wasted and > money you spent > > in > > > a doomed attempt to master a machine with a mind of it's own. --from > > > computing: A HACKER'S DICTIONARY > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Scott Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:28 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: 0.20.3rc bug > > > > > > > > > > > > Change master-name to master-reference on your fo:page-sequence. In > > this > > > > case, the error is correct and your FO is wrong. The previous > > > > versions were > > > > written to the Candidate Recommendation and not the Oct 15th > > > > Recommendation > > > > which had that change. > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Matthew L. Avizinis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:09 PM > > > > Subject: 0.20.3rc bug > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > I have not posted any bugs before and don't really know > the formal > > > > > procedure yet, and I haven't seen this brought up by anyone else > > either. > > > > > I have a stylesheet which produces an fo file with two > > > > fo:page-sequences. > > > > > It produces pdf's correctly with version <=0.20.2rc. > With 0.20.3.rc > > it > > > > > produces the message: > > > > > master-reference for fo:page-sequence matches no > > simple-page-master > > or > > > > > page-sequence-master > > > > > > > > > > It seems that there is something wrong with the new > version since I > > > > clearly > > > > > have two page-sequence-master s with the same names as the two > > > > > page-sequences. > > > > > thanks, > > > > > Matthew L. Avizinis <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Gleim Publications, Inc. > > > > > 4201 NW 95th Blvd. > > > > > Gainesville, FL 32606 > > > > > (352)-375-0772 ext. 101 > > > > > www.gleim.com <http://www.gleim.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > ======================================================================= > > > > > com·put·ing (kum' pyoot ing) > > > > > 1. n the art of calculating how much time you wasted and money you > > spent > > > > in > > > > > a doomed attempt to master a machine with a mind of it's > own. --from > > > > > computing: A HACKER'S DICTIONARY > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
