Hmm, good question. How is "punt" for an answer? Seriously, that's probably another case of delayed evaluation. Though I think the issue concerns the descendants of "marker" and not the properties on "marker" itself which are said to be ignored. This is certainly not handled correctly as it stands. I really hate those cases where property evaluation depends on where the stuff is laid out.
-Karen "Peter B. West" wrote: > > Karen, > > Thanks for this detailed info. What do you do about "ems" lengths in a > marker? > > Peter > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Expressions involving "em" units which are relative to > >font-size _are_ resolved during the FO tree building however. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
