jw
Jim Urban wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">As long as development of the C# version does interfere with the development
of the Java version, I have no problem with people porting FOP to C#.
However, I believe the primary effort should remain the Java version.
Jim Urban
Product Manager
Netsteps Inc.
Suite 505E
1 Pierce Pl.
Itasca, IL 60143
Voice: (630) 250-3045 x2164
Fax: (630) 250-3046-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kowalczyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: C# version of FOP
This project would be very important to those of us that plan to use C#
when Mono (.NET CLR, C# Compiler on Linux/*NIX) is ready. I had always
expected to use Batik and FOP through webservices, decoupled from my
ASP.NET that will run on Mono in the near future.
If C# FOP or Batik implementations keep pace with the Java state of the
art, that would definitely be an improvement in design and overhead and
a most compelling platform to develop against for anyone using Mono.
Best of luck with the FOP port, I for one am looking forward to it!
----------------------------------------------------- ----------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
