Bertrand, There's another gotcha - markers. The properties in markers are resolved relative to the retrieve-marker invocation point.
Peter Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >On Monday 18 March 2002 13:37, Peter B. West wrote: > >>The big problem is in defining the p.res step. How far do you need >>to go with this? If you require all of the relative lengths >>resolved, e.g., you'll have to wait until the layout is done. The >>properties are only finalised as the area tree is being constructed. >>It's one of the things that makes this all so frustrating. >> > >ok I see. >I'll try to play with this for RTF rendering based on jfor, to get a >feel for how hard/useful this is. > >In case of jfor, what is needed is mostly property inheritance, for >which AFAIK rules are well defined in FOP. > >I guess relative lengths will probably stay relative in the RTF code, >but I'll have to play with it to be positive about this. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
