Hi Victor, Usually it is a good idea to follow those guidelines.
I hope you didn't get the idea that I was ignoring the patch. It is just that it is for the branch and it can be a pain to get things set up. Hopefully another committer with the branch can give a look at it. On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 16:49, Victor Mote wrote: > I think my submission complied with http://xml.apache.org/fop/involved.html, > but I did not follow the link to http://xml.apache.org/source.html#, and I > see now that my submission was deficient in two ways: 1) not adding the > [PATCH] header, and 2) not using "diff -u". Should I resubmit the patch > using those conventions? Also, I see in some other postings use of a > [DOCUMENTATION] header. Is there a page (other than those above) where that > convention and any other relevant ones are discussed? There is no specific information that I am aware of. I can help get things noticed for the appropriate purpose. > Thanks for your patience. > > Victor Mote (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Enterprise Outfitters (www.outfitr.com) > 2025 Eddington Way > Colorado Springs, Colorado 80916 > Voice 719-622-0650, Fax 720-293-0044 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
