----- Message d'origine ----- De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So, you right about jdk1.3 - it remains to be seen, another alternatives could > be our own TR9 implementation (afaik renderx guys went this way last summer, > probably because they have to support jdk1.1 and ms jvm) or some third-party > implementation, e.g. ICU4J.
They also claim to have only limited (or basic) bidi support, if I recall properly. Did I understand properly Peter that FOP 1.0 should support Jdk 1.3 ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
