Hmmm...maybe we could use a JVM profiler like jProf (http://starship.python.net/crew/garyp/jProf.html) for this?
-----Original Message----- From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Alt-Design: Preliminary results FO tree build test Peter B. West wrote: > Herewith the preliminary results of running the alt.design FO tree build > against the 51 page test document supplied by Bertrand. What is included in this measurement? I presume it's fo parsing, userconfig processing and fo tree buiding? Thanks for the > file Bertrand. The file yields a tree of 11044 nodes. The pull buffer > is set to 64, the maximum size of the FoXMLEvent pool is 74, and the > total number of FoXMLEvent objects created is 78 (next event id -1). > > The sytem is a 256Mb PII laptop running Sun's Java 1.4.1 under Redhat 7.3. > > Elapsed time from the beginning of org.apache.fop.apps.Fop main to the > end of the FO tree build is 15960. The preorder scan of the tree takes > that to 16176. > > The test is run within a 'time' command with the results > 18.02s real 11.71s user 0.24s system It's rather interesting to compare it with the trunk code. But I believe we need real profiler software results to make any serious conclusions. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
