Peter B. West wrote: > Victor Mote wrote: > > While working on an FAQ for FO dtd & schema, I see that we have > two schema > > in docs/foschema: fop4f.xsd & fop4.xsd. They are similar. Does > anyone know > > what the purpose for both is, why we have 2, or the 4 & 4f designations? > > Victor, > > I think that Chuck was appending a letter to each version of the schema. > When he submitted fop4g.xsd, I cleaned the tabs out of fop4f.xsd, and > committed that file as fop4.xsd. I then did similar clanups on > fop4g.xsd, and committed that as a change to fop4.xsd. So from > fop4.xsd, you can recover the latest two versions of the file. > fop4f.xsd is for historical reference only, left in case there were any > problems with my cleanups of fop4.xsd. At the time I let Chuck know > what I had done, and asked him if he could submit a diff against that > file as his next version. > > See > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=103547432006815&w=4
If no one objects, I would like to move this information to fop.xsd & let CVS handle the revision issues. The viewcvs program allows us to append a revision number, so we could even branch & tag this to keep it tied to releases. Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
