Response below. -----Original Message----- From: Arved Sandstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sat 12/14/2002 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter >>Sure, in a narrow sense. Binary rather than source. In practical terms C is considerably more portable. Java is basically a Windows and MacOS X VM.<< Last I checked, it was more than that. At a minimum, your list of OSes is a tad bit small. My company runs JBoss on an AS/400 running OS400, and one of my old instant messengers has been reported to be running on OS/2. And then there's things like the KVM. I'd like to see C so portable it goes straight from a Linux desktop and compiles for a Palm without requiring a mountain of preprocessor directives. >> We could debate that. :-) I spend a lot of time every week dealing with Java NPEs. << I'm not sure what your point is there. I deal with null pointers in any language with pointers. >> Seriously, you're right. Java is better for this. Writing good C requires a lot of background. << Lesser men could take offense to that. Especially if they weren't C programmers already.
<<winmail.dat>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]