Thanks for the note! I'll POST it... BTW...
On 6/3/2003 9:09 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
BTW, it's funny. I also wondered if the xsl:include shouldn't be top-level. But after I made his text.xsl well-formed (!) the FO got generated just fine on my machine. Strange.
I'm guessing, that it was "well-formed" however, it probably did not "validate"... at least not if he used a DTD or "proper"(?) SCHEMA which had "xsl:include" in the proper place (at the top level of xsl:stylseheet).
[OT] This type of well-formed-ness/valid issue bit me in the rear, as I was under the impression Internet Explorer validated XML files if a DTD were attached. It does *not* (one beta version of 5--or was it 5.5?--did, but they ended up shipping versions of IE 5+ checking only for well-formedness). I ended up getting our programmers (who write the code which output the XML which I apply XSL-FO stylesheets to generate PDF & print, etc.) to install XMLValidator on their Windows boxen:
http://www.uni-giessen.de/club/misc/xmlvalid101/xmlvalid.html
I could've had them use xalan or some other JAVA tool, but opted for this tool as an alternative to my Windows running brethren...
--
Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
