I guess we have some cleanup to do--I'll take a look at some of the FO's this weekend and report back to the team on property-removals we may need. The interesting FO's will be those which are actually utilizing invalid properties in their processing logic--hopefully there won't be many!
Glen --- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.Pietschmann wrote: > > Copy+paste > > Well, actually the FO classes were boostrapped by > generating the Java > classes from an XML file derived from a draft of the > spec itself. > Note: draft. Probably also some errors crept in > during the process... > > J.Pietschmann > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
