On 07.07.2003 10:28:59 Chris Bowditch wrote: > >I'm currently figuring out how best to solve this. I'm looking at the > >code from jpeg2ps which doesn't seem to have a problem with these JPEG > >files. The code in there is made to ignore any trailing bytes but > >processes the whole stream twice if I interpret correctly. Maybe looking > >for the EOI marker in our code and cutting off there is better > >performance-wise. But jpeg2ps' code is on the safe side in any case. > >Preferences anyone? > > > > Sorry but this message arrived after I left on Friday. I dont have a > preference. Out of interest, which option did you go for? Speed or mimicking > the jpeg2ps code?
I can't say for sure what the performance differences are between the two solutions. Anyway I have chosen the quick & easy path and went for the jpeg2ps-style approach since I don't have too much time available. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
