Re: fo isolation complete (almost)

[J.Pietschmann]

Victor Mote wrote:
[interesting stuff]
Package    1   2   3a  3b  4
tools    |   |   | x |   |   |
Should be 4 (apps) module, I think.

util     | x |   |   |   |   |
Uh, I never liked that.

Here is my +1.
+0

Now in the table above, the "common" package does not exist, but represents
five classes that I would like to move to complete the process of isolating
column 1. Those classes are:
  apps/FOPException
+1
  apps/FOUserAgent
???
  apps/FOFileHandler
  apps/InputHandler
Should stay in apps

  pdf/PDFEncryptionParams
Why should this go into a "commons"?

apps/FOFileHandler and apps/InputHandler could logically go into the FO Tree
package.
I don't think so. They are abstractions for the Processor input and
don't have anything to do with the FO tree.
J.Pietschmann



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]