DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23883>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23883

SVG embedded in FO cannot handle large (6digit) translates

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-12 23:40 -------
Tom,

Your patch fixed things quite well in 0.20.5--I tested it--*but* the nightly 
maintenance version of 0.20.5 has a different Batik library (a version of a 
couple of months ago, that we had to update because of an API change) that your 
patch would *not* fix.  We're going to pass on making the change in 0.20.5 
(maintenance is mostly frozen anyway).  Your patch has the same problems with 
1.0, which has an even newer Batik library, however, there may be also other 
issues in 1.0 causing the problem there.)

There may be other issues as well with the patch you supplied, namely the loss 
of the third method which allows one to choose the number of desired decimal 
points--I'm unsure how needed it is right now. (Also, I'm unclear how 
exponential notation is an issue with the double data type--that should be 
understood inherently with that datatype, correct?  Nonetheless, your patch 
*did* fix the problem.)  Some of our more experienced SVG developers may be 
able to comment on this later for 1.0.

The bug below has gotten too huge for anyone to look at, so I just took the 
relevant points and redid the bug in #24666.  Clearly, this is something that 
needs fixing but we'll concentrate on making sure it will be OK in 1.0 instead. 

Thanks,
Glen

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24666 ***

Reply via email to