> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Andreas, > > i hope you dont mind a little feedback on this. >
Hi Chris, Not at all! Thanx for the fine input. I'll definitely get a lot closer to what I'm (and FOP is) after. (Support for the number-columns-spanned, number-columns-repeated and column-number is indeed *very* easily added to Table.addChild(), for columns, but that gets us more than halfway there). Another, property-related question (not specifically for you, Chris, but *if* you have an idea...): Is it the intention that the 'Table Properties' are in someway moulded into a class (like now the Common*Properties are), or is the way I see them defined/used now in the relevant classes in fop.fo.flow the intended end-result? Later, Andreas
