Glen Mazza wrote:
I believe the same logger reference would just be used with each thread instead,
es, and this is exactly the problem. It is conceivable that different loggers might be used for different processors which run in concurrent threads. A static logger reference prohibits this.
However, the logger naming is purely conventional (at least in 1.4 logging), so if the need for different logging in different threads arose, it could be accommodated by appending a thread-based suffix to the logger name. Or was there some other problem you had in mind here?
Peter -- Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
