Re: User configuration

[Glen Mazza]

Yes, I think we agreed (when we were discussing the Avalon Logger to 
Commons Logging switch) to stay with Avalon configuration unless and 
until something better is found.  If you find something different you'd 
like to recommend, just let us know--now's the time!

Only concern I have about Avalon configuration--or any other method--is 
that embedded users should not need to import configuration libraries in 
their code if they are *not* using a user configuration file. 

Glen

Simon Pepping write:

If I understand correctly, apps.Fop.main() does not do much with the
user configuration file that can be specified with the -c command line
option. I would like to make this work. Before I put work in it, I
would like to ask: Do we stick with avalon configuration?
I had a quick look at Jakarta Commons Configuration. They do not yet
have a stable release.
Regards, Simon