Have you tried looking at the "Long Headers" (aka Full Headers, Extended Headers, etc.)? Looking at the Long Headers for both messages should provide insight into which address is 'extra'.

Web Maestro Clay

On Jul 24, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Peter B. West wrote:
From: Peter B. West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Doubled commit messages
Date: July 24, 2004 10:38:28 AM PDT
To: fop-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from firewall.medata.com (tustin-net-firewall-int [172.24.0.1]) by mail.medata.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6OHcjXL022421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:38:45 -0700
Received: from [209.237.227.199] (helo=mail.apache.org) by firewall.medata.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BoQTv-0006h2-Fy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:38:47 -0700
Received: (qmail 68225 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2004 17:38:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 68208 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2004 17:38:44 -0000
Received: from [203.12.160.103] (HELO mail.tpgi.com.au) (203.12.160.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:38:39 -0700
Received: from tpg.com.au (203-219-25-88-bri-ts2-2600.tpgi.com.au [203.219.25.88]) by mail.tpgi.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6OHcTsp013687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:38:31 +1000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Asf-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040124
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Tpg-Antivirus: Passed
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9b27bf4a4363194e7857fe52dc7bbea4
X-Synonym: Copied by Synonym (http://www.modulo.ro/synonym) to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75, clamav-milter version 0.75 on mail.medata.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.medata.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63
X-Sanitizer: This message has been sanitized!
X-Sanitizer-Url: http://mailtools.anomy.net/
X-Sanitizer-Rev: $Id: Sanitizer.pm,v 1.87 2004/05/07 17:42:12 bre Exp $


Is anyone else getting double cvs commit messages? I assume I am subscribed under more than one address, but my guess at what the redundant address might be has proved fruitless.

Peter
--
Peter B. West <http://cv.pbw.id.au/>




Reply via email to