Just giving my opinion--I also recognize that the output interface is a bit rough, as Finn was saying, and may still need some work, possibly along the lines of what you were suggesting.
Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, forget it. I'm obviously worse at explaining > things than I thought. > I don't have the time to chew this through. It > should have been quick > and painless, but obviously it isn't. Hopefully, > someone else has a > better solution. > > I'm sorry for wasting your time writing this answer. > Back to my JNI > wrapper for FOP... > > Jeremias Maerki > >
