--- Finn Bock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Glen] > > > Finn, ***be very careful***, the definition of > tree > > extension was #2, *not* #1 (see previous email). > I > > don't like its name, it should be OutOfAreaObject > or > > something like that. > > And why shouldn't extensions be allowed to create > OutOfAreaObjects? Some > extension writers will needed that just like the > author of fox:bookmarks > needed it. >
OK, now I see. Thanks. Glen
