I can't tell what side-effects will arise from what I requested. I was hoping there weren't any. Why don't you just ask the infrastructure people? They will know better.
PS. Can we please use general@ for such discussions to minimize cross-posting? By now, everyone interested in the XML Graphics setup will be subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 01.11.2004 16:59:15 Clay Leeds wrote: > NOTE: This was sent to fop-dev & batik-dev as I have a question about > the mailing lists I'd like to clarify before we 'ask' [EMAIL PROTECTED] <snip/> > When the Apache Forrest project changed to a new domain, they also > changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unfortunately, with this change comes (IMHO) a significant problem for > browsers of the archives: forrest-dev@ mail is a completely separate > mailing list (with a separate interface). The problem is that > forrest-dev was used for *all* dev *&* user mailing list traffic, so a > search in the 'current' mailing lists' archives does not include > content in forrest-dev (that's a separate search). > > For example, with the change to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I'd > like to make certain (if possible or logical) that we don't end up with > a similar problem. > > I'm not certain what the 'solution' looks like (or even if it's a real > problem!), but I thought we should chat. If it is a problem, we may > need to set up <mailing-list>@xmlgraphics.apache.org as an alias to > <mailing-list>@xml.apache.org. IOW, the mailing lists do *not* change > and we add aliases for @xmlgraphics.a.o. > > Is this something we should worry about? IMO, the ability to search > relevant archives using one search is more important than having a > 'real' address vs. an alias. We still would want to have all headers > (e.g., Reply-To:) and trailers set to <mailing-list>@xmlgraphics.a.o > > Thoughts? Jeremias Maerki
