Found it myself. It's the page-number and page-number-citation LMs which cause bigger boxes than normal text. Test added, trying to fix it.
On 29.06.2005 18:26:26 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm trying to track this down but I get nowhere. At first, I thought it > was the default for line-height which is 1.2em for both FOP Trunk and > 0.20.5. Still, in Nils' example the document is much more compact in > 0.20.5 than in the trunk. > > When I dial down the default for line-height in the trunk the result > gets better but I'm pretty sure that's the wrong approach. > > Does anyone else have an idea? My bag-o-ideas is soon empty. > > On 29.06.2005 09:12:28 bugzilla wrote: > > BTW, Nils' example shows again that we have another point to attend to: Our > > current nominal text box is much bigger than it was for 0.20.5. I've seen > > this > > before and I think we're approaching the time when this needs to be fixed. > > Jeremias Maerki Jeremias Maerki
