Manuel Mall wrote: > BTW, why do we have the 3 columns Basic | Extended | Complete? Every > row will only have one cell out of those 3 filled out. Wouldn't it > make more sense to have a single column called Compliance or Core with > the values Basic, Extended or Complete? That would save valuable > screen space and give us room to add columns for each release.
The original compliance page had each cell color-coded to indicate compliance with each of the three levels. So, if feature A is required for "Extended" support and was not supported by FOP, the "Basic" column would have the "compliant" color, while the "Extended" and "Complete" columns would have the "non-compliant" color. I built this just slightly before we converted to Forrest. Since we converted to Forrest, the custom XSLT required for the above has been a pain, and I think it has been eliminated. I just looked at the published page, and it looks like you still have the three columns, but not the color-coding, so combining the three as you suggest makes good sense. (Sorry for the slow response. My email is being bounced as spam). Victor Mote
