On 02.08.2005 12:22:02 guillaume wrote: > > Uhm, I don't think we have current CVS snapshots anymore since we moved > > to Subversion some time ago. Seems to be a left-over that we need to get > > Well, I took it from http://svn.apache.org/snapshots/ so the name would be > quite misleading. And it seems not to be left-over as cocoon-2.2 is also > featured here, and is IIRC younger than the Cocoon CVS-to-SVN > transition...
As I said, I need to find out what I can do to clear this up. > > > rid of. Please download the sources using Subversion. Subversion has the > > advantage over CVS that it works over HTTP and therefore passes > > most Firewalls and Proxies. > > I will try. > > > > Want to send a patch? :-) > > Sure, as long as the issues summed up in my other message are OK! I told you what was important. Now it's up to you and we'll review when the actual patch comes in. > Would a > "[PATCH] rtflib independant from FOP" bug in Bugzilla (with attachement > done with diff -u with xml-fop/ as base directory) would do? That's simply "svn diff >mydiff.txt" now with Subversion in place. > > We'd prefer if you would subscribe if you want to take part in the > > discussions. > > I understand that, but for the reasons described in my other message I'd > rather not for the moment... > > > > Thanks for your feedback! > > You're welcome. After (ab)using FOP so much it's time to give back for me! :) LOL. I hope there will be many more who follow your example. Jeremias Maerki
