It seems that [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is what gmane.org uses (see http://gmane.org/list-address.php?group=gmane.text.xml.fop.devel), does not exist anymore...
--- Begin Message ---Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (qmail 90279 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2005 14:54:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:54:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:54:05 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Dzy6u-0006px-53 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:51:18 +0200 Received: from lns-vlq-17f-81-56-174-131.adsl.proxad.net ([81.56.174.131]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:51:16 +0200 Received: from guillaume by lns-vlq-17f-81-56-174-131.adsl.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:51:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Guillaume =?utf-8?b?RMOpZmxhY2hl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: rtflib independance from FOP (continued) + JAFOG Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 35 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 81.56.174.131 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr-FR; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4) Sender: news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please continue on the other thread from now on, I'm trying to close this one! ;) Jeremias Maerki <dev.jeremias <at> greenmail.ch> writes: > As long as you preserve the existing functionality, you're free to > propose any changes. If the RTF library is useful without XSL-FO, that's > absolutely fine and we can make sure in the future that it stays that > way. OK. > JFOR has been integrated in FOP, so FOP is no[w] the most up-to-date > version. OK, now I just need to use SVN or get the confirmation that the snapshots are current before preparing a first patch. > > Jeremias : what about JAFOG (Java API for Formatting Objects Generation)? > > Thanks for the suggestion. However, "formatting objects generation" > sounds almost like we're generating FO, not that we consume FO, and in > the meantime the API can do more than just consume XSL-FO. It can handle > any XML-based format which produces graphical output (like XSL-FO, SVG, > MathML, you name it). JAGUX: Java API for Graphics Using XML? Time to start a contest for more imaginative people I guess! :) > Poor guy. I heard some people are quite happy with accessing lists > through GMANE (http://gmane.org/) but I haven't tried it myself. This is a test BTW! ;) Many thanks for the suggestion, it seems to work well!
--- End Message ---
