So what's left to be done in your POV? On 02.08.2005 22:34:26 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Manuel Mall wrote: > [snip] > > Makes sense to me. Actually this is exactly what the 0.20.5 Fop.java > > does. > Well, I'd rather refrain from reintroducing a ComandLineOptions > like class. > I'd still say the most intuitive setup would be > - API classes as usual (FO processor, configuration, maybe > interfaces and implementations for input and output of the > FO processor) > - A single CLI class with a main() method and possibly a few more > methods for better structuring which parses the command line > (maybe using commons CLI), sets up a configuration as well as > input and output for the FO processor (possibly using an XSLT > in the input pipeline), instanciates a FO processor, runs it, > and performs clean up. > - A sample servlet class roughly doing the same > - etc. > There is no need for the sample CLI class and the servlet class > to be small. I can't see how a CommandLineOption class or parsing > command line options can be reused elswhere. > > J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki
