On 03.08.2005 22:26:51 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > fo:inline, fo:bidi-override and fo:inline-container are all inline-level > > FOs and all allow block-level content. > > I think an inline-container should create a single area as > a first approximation, unless the content fills a whole page. > Therefore it shouldn't pose a real problem in this context.
That's what I thought. > I have no idea how an inline container whose content overflows > the page bpd should be handled. Well, if it simply generates a single box, that box is broken as a whole. If it doesn't fit the page: Meeeeep! :-) I've no idea if an inline-container is supposed to be broken at all and if yes, how. > Fortunately, in the case of > changing the write mode e.g. from lr-tb to tb-lr, the ipd of > the content in the inline container has to be fixed, which > translates to a fixed bpd in the context of the ancestor block > of the inline container. Unless I misunderstood the spec, of > course. > The real headache is caused by the anticipation that the most > common use case for inline container will be embedding tables > inline, for all kind of purposes... > > J.Pietschmann Jeremias Maerki
