DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:30 ------- Luca, interesting point. It was my understanding from the reading of the spec that "normal" and "0pt" are virtually the same: For "normal": .optimum = ("the normal inter-word space, as defined by the current font and/or the UA" - "the inline-progression-dimension of the glyph-area obtained by formatting the fo:character") / 2, .maximum = .optimum, .minimum = .optimum, .precedence = force, and .conditionality = discard. For a <length>: .optimum = <length> / 2, .maximum = .optimum, .minimum = .optimum, .precedence = force, and .conditionality = discard. These two formulas would give the same values for length="0pt" assuming "the normal inter-word space, as defined by the current font and/or the UA" is the same as "the inline-progression-dimension of the glyph-area obtained by formatting the fo:character". But when specifying "normal" the block is properly justified. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
