If by the size table, you mean the new mapping for "small", "medium", "large", "x-large" etc. in FOPropertyMapping, then yes, it sounds right. No concerns.
On 06.08.2005 12:20:47 Manuel Mall wrote: > Hi fop-devs, > > I am current looking into getting relative font-size property values, > e.g. "larger" or "smaller", implemented. The spec gives some leeway in > that area, i.e. it says in 7.8.4: "If the parent element's size is not > close to a table entry, the user agent is free to interpolate between > table entries or round off to the closest one.". I would like to > implement this as: "If the parent element's size is not close to a > table entry, FOP will round off to the closest one.", that is don't use > interpolation and some FOP specific definition of what "size not close > to a table entry" means. > > Does that sound right to others on the list? Any concerns? > > Thanks > > Manuel Jeremias Maerki
