On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:13 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > This is definitely wrong, you're right. I know how that got through > the tests: The checks are insufficient. The stuff that is checked is > definitely ok. But bpd/ipd are not checked. That's the problem. > Thanks - I'll fix the problem and the test.
> On 01.09.2005 15:53:46 Manuel Mall wrote: > > I think the area tree viewport generated by the current version for > > an e-g with padding and borders is wrong. > > > > Here is the fo snippet (from external-graphic_border_padding.xml): > > > > <fo:external-graphic > > src="../../resources/images/bgimg300dpi.jpg" > > border="solid 5pt" padding="5pt" background-color="white" > > /> > > > > and this is the generated viewport: > > > > <viewport background="color=#ffffff" bap="10000 10000 10000 10000" > > border-after="(solid,#000000,5000)" > > border-before="(solid,#000000,5000)" > > border-end="(solid,#000000,5000)" > > border-start="(solid,#000000,5000)" > > bpd="66080" bpda="86080" > > ipd="66080" ipda="86080" > > padding-after="5000" > > padding-before="5000" > > padding-end="5000" > > padding-start="5000"> > > <image bap="0 0 0 0" bpd="0" ipd="0" > > pos="10000 10000 46080 46080" > > url="../../resources/images/bgimg300dpi.jpg" /> > > </viewport> > > > > The viewport bpd/ipd includes the padding and border width while it > > should only be the content width of 46080. > > > > Am I correct? I am happy to fix it - just would like confirmation > > that this is actually incorrect. BTW, the generated PDF looks > > pretty wrong to me as well. > > > > Manuel > > > > PS: Not sure how that got through the layout engine tests! > > Jeremias Maerki Manuel
