Hi Oleg, I see you're still a lurker. :-)
J#: I don't know. It looks like you need a Visual Studio .NET license which I don't have. Was this what nfop was done with? I didn't look. C#: I don't have time to help with such an endeavour in the near future. That's a huge task. And the Java version takes effort enough at the moment. I know people who would be very interested to run FOP on .NET but for the moment I'm only going to take the "easy road" via IKVM so see where I get. But I guess one could think about creating additional source code in C# or any other .NET language to provide additional features that might be difficult with IKVM. Since IKVM has problems with AWT it might make sense to write a renderer in C# to do direct printing, for example. But my priorities are with PDF and PS at the moment. On 22.11.2005 10:27:09 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > I think having the opportunity to provide a .NET version of FOP would > > widen the number of potential users considerably especially since > > to my knowledge there's no usable open source .NET FO implementation out > > there. Depending on the license situation (IKVM is BSD but GNU Classpath > > is LGPL) we could even think about distributing .NET binaries. > > I think that's a good move and definitely would be well accepted in the > .NET community. I could help you on that. > And besides IKVM what do yo uthink about other options - using J# or > even porting to C#? > -- > Oleg Jeremias Maerki
